He came to Australia as a refugee
from Vietnam. Now Kim Huynh has uncovered the story behind his
family’s flight.
|

|
|
Van and Thiet Huynh are proud
of their son Kim, the successful scholar and now chronicler
of the family’s voyage.
|
Young authors are often advised to write about what they know
best. Young scholars, on the other hand, are encouraged to write
about what others know best, and to keep well away from the
pitfalls of the subjective ‘I’. So what are those
people who would be writers and scholars to do? “Start
and negotiate for yourself,” Kim Huynh says.
It’s sound advice. But where to start writing about Huynh?
Should it be with his starry rise from student to scholar, where
he now shines as one of the up-and-coming lecturers in political
science at ANU? Should it be with his forays into opinion-based
journalism, where he has pondered the implications of having
an ‘uncool’ Prime Minister and worried about the
plight of displaced people in Iraq? Or should it be with the
publication of his first book, Where the sea takes us, in which
he tells of his family’s flight from post-war Vietnam?
Perhaps it’s best to begin with origins, as Huynh does
in his family history.
In 1979, Thiet and Van Huynh and their two infant sons fled
their troubled homeland to start a new life in Australia. They
were among the first wave of ‘boat people’, a term
coined to describe the mass exodus of fearful citizens from
Communist-controlled Vietnam after the fall of Saigon. Kim,
aged two and the baby of the family, was also the youngest of
the 507 people crammed aboard a small wooden boat. Huynh, now
30, says has no real memories of the journey, nor any recollections
of the pressures that led to his family’s escape.
“Part of the reason my dad decided to leave while we were
so young was that so we would never know,” Huynh says.
“He was happy to risk our lives. He knew that we were
particularly imperilled by the trip. But he didn’t want
us to remember anything about Vietnam: the oppression, the poverty
that our family had to suffer. So there was a good reason to
go while we were so young. The irony now is that I’ve
spent the last few years trying to find out about those things,
but mum and dad are very happy about that so it doesn’t
matter.”
Huynh began digging into his family’s history when, as
an Honours student at ANU, he chose to explore aspects of the
personal and the political in his thesis on refugees. He squirms
with embarrassment at the memory of his undergraduate prose,
confessing that very little of that early writing survives in
Where the sea takes us. Although he cringes at that work today,
Huynh says it was the first step towards a much more detailed
exploration of his personal history. By understanding more about
the reasons his family fled Vietnam and resettled in Australia,
he was able to create a sense of continuity between his self-confessed
fortunate life in Canberra and the cultural turmoil of Southeast
Asia.
At the end of the Vietnam War, the United States withdrew its
troops after the Paris Peace Accords. The Northern Vietnamese
and the Southern Revolutionaries, who shared a communist ideology,
took control of Saigon in 1975. Thiet and Van Huynh were devastated
by the development. They couldn’t believe that their country
had been taken over so quickly and so easily. They believed
that America had double-crossed them, after waging a war against
North Vietnam and the communists for over a decade. Many southern
Vietnamese feared that there was going to be retribution and
bloodshed under the communists. The fact that Pol Pot had just
taken over in neighbouring Cambodia added to the general sense
of tension and dread. Huynh describes it as a “world turned
upside down”, in which the future appeared very bleak.
This tumultuous context led to his family leaving for Australia,
where they found peace and prosperity.
When describing his childhood in Canberra, Huynh says he didn’t
feel alienated, despite a few experiences of racial intolerance.
“My parents were always working so hard. Dad worked full-time
for the electricity authority, and the family also ran a bakery.
We didn’t have any time to fraternise with Vietnamese
anyway. As a result, my brother and I couldn’t speak much
Vietnamese at all between the ages of 10 and 20 or so. We were
good at sports, we did well at school and we were reasonably
popular. Compared to other Vietnamese kids , we didn’t
stick out so much. At least I don’t think we did. But
we had a niggling desire to find out about who we are, too,
and that’s largely the impetus behind this project.”
Another factor which spurred Huynh’s family history was
that, as the youngest son, he was expected to stay at home and
care for his parents. When his older brother moved away, the
budding political scientist says he felt torn between tradition
and his genuine affection for his parents on the one hand, and
his desire to get out and see the world on the other. Tradition
won out: until very recently, Huynh lived at his family home.
“My brother left as soon as he finished high school. There
is a tradition amongst some Vietnamese that the youngest should
stay at home and look after the parents. There was a great conflict
there, because I’d grown up as a western individualist,
but I felt obliged to observe this somewhat eastern tradition.
Just before my honours year, I thought, ‘How am I going
to make the best out of this? How am I going to turn this in
my favour?’ I thought, ‘Rather than complain about
this – which I did anyway – I’m going to find
out why I feel like this, why I feel torn”.
He also needed to get his parents to open up about their past,
which would require them to rake over some painful memories.
“I negotiated a way in which we could talk most comfortably.
It didn’t work if we just sat across from each other,
because dad would talk over mum. So I’d go walking and
running with mum, and I’d carry a notebook so I could
jot down things. Or hang out with dad, while he was working
down in the garage, I’d ask him questions. A lot of times
at dinner I’d have the notebook under the table. Perhaps
my methodology lacked rigour, it was certainly unconventional,
but I did my best to be faithful to my parents and their story.”
As well as reconciling his competing loyalties to Vietnamese
and Western cultures, Huynh also views the project as a chance
to bring together his personal and professional activities.
A lecturer in refugee politics, he spends much of his time as
an academic thinking and teaching about how displaced people
have been treated by ‘host’ cultures.
“There are two big questions for me: how do we find belonging
for people, and how do we find truth for people. They’re
reflected in my book, but they’re also reflected in my
teaching.
“If we can understand the most extreme forms of dislocation
and alienation, then maybe we can find some belonging for ourselves
too. It’s not just learning about facts, and history and
other people – students in these courses should also be
able to find some solace or insight for their own lives.”
Huynh believes Australia’s reception of refugees over
the last 30 years has involved good and bad aspects. Perhaps
unsurprisingly, he describes the nation’s welcome of ‘boat
people’ in the late 1970s as a positive development.
“For a long time it was a pejorative term: ‘You’re
a boaty, right?’. I go back to my high school, where I
used to be one of the only Vietnamese kids. Now there’s
a Vietnamese posse, and they’re very proud to call themselves
boaties. I’m not saying everyone should go out and use
the term boaties or boat people, but I am enamoured by the way
a lot of the younger kids are using it with pride and self-affirmation.
“[That period] stands as an example of what Australia
can be like: of how generous and welcoming Australians can be
with good political leadership. We can take in 90,000 Asians
without ever having a history of seeking to take in large numbers
of Asians. Overall, it’s been a magnificent success. A
success not unlike the intake of refugees after World War II.
That’s what we’re capable of in Australia. We don’t
have to be fearful of outsiders. We don’t have to view
them as contagions or economic cripples.
“I’m very concerned about asylum seekers being criminalized
as ‘illegals’ or ‘queue jumpers’. I
can understand the political prerogatives behind wanting to
do that. But the unintended consequences for the Australian
popular psyche and the opportunity costs in terms of hampering
who we can be – one of the great compassionate and multicultural
nations – make border security policies as we know them
very costly. Even more concerning than the human costs, which
are terrible to those asylum seekers who so desperately want
to call Australia home.”
Father and son
Kim Huynh opens each chapter in his book Where the
sea takes us with a dialogue between himself and his parents.
Thiet: How’s the study going, son? Have you given anything
to your professors lately? They’re happy with your progress,
yes? Have you explained to them that your thesis is about your
mother and me? But it’s not really about us, is it? It’s
about Vietnamese history and international politics: things
that are much more important than our family.
Kim: Don’t worry, Dad. I haven’t been kicked out
of university, not yet. I know how important it is for me to
finish my PhD and find a good job, how important it is to you
anyway.
Thiet: I’m happy to hear that, son. Your mum and I know
how hard you’re working. We have total faith in you. If
you want my advice though, the politics is the most important
part. That’s what’ll help you become a lecturer
or even a professor in future. You won’t make as much
money as your brother, but you could make a big name for yourself.
What you have to realise is that Vietnam has a long history.
You know, for much of the twentieth century it was under French
rule. Do you know about Geneva in 1954? Then the Americans came
and went. Do you know about Guam in 1969? And of course there
was communism.
Kim: Dad! I’ve been doing my PhD and teaching politics
for two years. I’ve read all about French colonialism,
the Vietnam War, the Nixon Doctrine, Maoism and Marxism. There
are thousands of books on those topics. I don’t want to
talk to you about all that. I want to talk to you about your
childhood, what it was like growing up in your village. I want
to know about my grandfather and my uncles. How many times do
I have to tell you, my research is just as much about our family
as it is about anyone, any war or anything else?
Thiet: Alright, alright, you don’t want to listen to your
father, that’s your decision. Where do you want to start,
then? I’ll tell you whatever I can remember. It’s
not that important or interesting though. Nobody wants to know
about us, there’s nothing to tell.
^^
|
|

ANU
Reporter
Spring 2007
|